Implementasi Kebijakan Pelayanan Keprotokolan di Kementerian Koordinator Bidang Pembangunan Manusia dan Kebudayaan

Ricki Hendriyana

Abstract


This study aims to analyze the implementation of protocol service policies at the Coordinating Ministry for Human Development and Culture as a strategic instrument in supporting good governance. Using a descriptive qualitative research design based on institutional case studies, data were collected through in-depth interviews, participant observation, and analysis of official documents. The results indicate that protocol services have a dual function—administrative and symbolic—reflecting the legitimacy and public image of the bureaucracy. Policy implementation is supported by formal regulations, experienced human resources, and relatively adequate infrastructure. However, obstacles remain, including limited trained staff, a limited budget, and suboptimal adaptation to the demands of digitalization and hybrid event management. The study also found that innovations such as the development of e-protocol applications and the implementation of digital service models contribute significantly to increasing efficiency and transparency. These findings confirm that the success of protocol implementation is largely determined by a combination of apparatus professionalism, technological support, and cross-sector coordination. This study provides a theoretical contribution by positioning protocol within a policy-based public service framework, while also providing practical recommendations for strengthening bureaucratic reform in the digital era.

Keywords


Protocol; Policy Implementation; Public Services

Full Text:

PDF

References


Alhassan, F., Asare, J., & Owusu, A. (2020). Public service professionalism and effective policy implementation. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 30(4), 567–582.

Arifin, M., & Nugroho, R. (2022). Digital transformation and bureaucratic adaptation: Rethinking protocol services in hybrid governance. Journal of Public Administration Studies, 15(2), 211–228. https://doi.org/10.1080/JPAS.2022.154

Birt, L., Scott, S., Cavers, D., Campbell, C., & Walter, F. (2016). Member Checking: A Tool to Enhance Trustworthiness or Merely a Nod to Validation? In Qualitative Health Research (Vol. 26, Issue 13). https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732316654870

Bowen, G. A. (2009). Document Analysis as a Qualitative Research Method. Qualitative Research Journal, 9(2), 27–40.

Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing Among Five Approaches (4th ed.). Sage Publications.

Denhardt, J. V., & Denhardt, R. B. (2015). The New Public Service Serving, Not Steering.

Dwiyanto, A. (2018). Mewujudkan good governance melalui pelayanan publik. Gadjah Mada University Press.

Edwards, G. C. (2017). Implementing public policy. CQ Press.

Fauzi, M., Andika, F., Saraswati, K. A., & Wijayanti, T. (2025). Self-Presentation Through Visual Framing in Political Communication of Candidates in Elections on Social Media. 1(2), 62–74. https://doi.org/10.14710/southsight.202529455

Guba, E., & Lincoln, Y. S. (1985). Naturalistic Inquiry.

Israel, M. (2014). Research Ethics and Integrity for Social Scientists: Beyond Regulatory Compliance 2nd Edition.

Kallio, H., Pietilä, A.-M., Johnson, M., & Docent, M. K. (2016). Systematic methodological review: developing a framework for a qualitative semi-structured interview guide. JAN Leading Global Nursing Research, 72(12), 2954–2965.

Lee, J., & Kim, H. (2022). Empathy and relationship quality in higher education service encounters. Journal of Marketing for Higher Education, 32(2), 205–223.

Nowell, L. S., Norris, J. M., White, D. E., & Moules, N. J. (2017). Thematic Analysis: Striving to Meet the Trustworthiness Criteria. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 16(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406917733847

Nugroho, R. (2017). Public policy: Teori, manajemen, dan analisis kebijakan. PT Elex Media Komputindo.

Osborne, S. P., Radnor, Z., & Nasi, G. (2016). A new theory for public service management? Toward a public service-dominant approach. The American Review of Public Administration, 43(2), 135–158. https://doi.org/10.1177/0275074012466935

Palinkas, L. A., Horwitz, S. M., Green, C. A., Wisdom, J. P., Duan, N., Hoagwood, K., Angeles, L., & Northwest, K. P. (2016). Purposeful sampling for qualitative data collection and analysis in mixed method implementation research. HHS Public Access, 42(5), 533–544. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10488-013-0528-y.Purposeful

Putri, A., & Santoso, B. (2021). Communication skills and the effectiveness of protocol services in public institutions. Journal of Communication and Public Relations, 12(3), 198–214. https://doi.org/10.1080/JCPR.2021.098

Setiyono, B. (2019). Protocol as a tool of state legitimacy in Indonesia. Indonesian Journal of Political Science, 5(2), 77–92.

Spradley, J. P. (2016). Participant observation. Holt, Rinehart and Winston.

Suryani, Rindaningsih, I., & Hidayatulloh. (2023). Systematic Literature Review (SLR): Pelatiahan Dan Pengembangan Sumber Daya Manusia. Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Riset Ilmu Sains, 2(3), 363–370. https://jurnal.serambimekkah.ac.id/index.php/perisai

Yin, R. K. (2017). Case study research and applications: Design and methods (6th ed.).

Yuliani, T. (2020). Technological adaptation in protocol services: A case study in Indonesian government agencies. Journal of E-Government Studies, 6(1), 67–81.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.32509/publika.v11i1.6080

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2025 Publika: Jurnal Ilmiah Administrasi dan Kebijakan Publik

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.



 Indexed by:

   

Recomended Tools:

 



Publika: Jurnal Ilmiah Administrasi dan Kebijakan Publik

Program Pascasarjana, Universitas Prof. Dr. Moestopo (Beragama)
Kampus I, Jl. Hang Lekir I/8 Jakarta Pusat, Indonesia 10270
WA: 082137118246 (Chat Only)

email: publika@jrl.moestopo.ac.id

 

Copyright (c) 2024 Publika: Jurnal Ilmiah Administrasi dan Kebijakan Publik

Licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.