MAPPING RESEARCH ON FORENSIC ACCOUNTING: A BIBLIOMETRIC REVIEW
Abstract
The increasing complexity of financial transactions, corporate fraud, and digital financial crimes has strengthened the role of forensic accounting as an essential discipline in fraud prevention, detection, and investigation. This study aims to map the development of forensic accounting research from 1987 to 2024 using a bibliometric approach based on the Scopus database. Data were collected using the keyword “forensic accounting” and analyzed using VOSviewer to examine publication trends, research themes, citation patterns, and international collaboration networks.
The results indicate a substantial increase in forensic accounting publications, particularly after 2020, reflecting growing academic and professional interest in fraud prevention and financial crime investigation. Keyword co-occurrence analysis identifies forensic accounting, fraud, fraud detection, fraud prevention, auditing, and forensic accountant as the dominant research themes. The findings also reveal the emergence of technology-oriented topics, including digital forensics, big data analytics, computer crime, and data-driven fraud investigation, highlighting the ongoing digital transformation of the field. Citation analysis identifies Rezaee as one of the most influential authors, while the United States remains the leading contributor in terms of publication productivity and citation impact.
This study contributes to the literature by providing a comprehensive overview of the intellectual structure and thematic evolution of forensic accounting research. The findings offer valuable insights for researchers, educators, practitioners, and policymakers regarding current developments and emerging trends in the field. Future research is expected to focus on artificial intelligence, machine learning, blockchain technology, cybersecurity, and cryptocurrency investigations, which are likely to play an increasingly important role in addressing sophisticated financial crimes.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Andriani, K. F., Budiartha, K., Sari, M. M. R., & Widanaputra, A. A. G. P. (2022). Fraud pentagon elements in detecting fraudulent financial statement. Linguistics and Culture Review, 6, 686–710. https://doi.org/10.21744/lingcure.v6nS1.2145
Association of Certified Fraud Examiners. (2024). Occupational Fraud 2024: A Report to the Nations.
Crumbley, D. L., Heitger, Lester E, & Smith, G. S. (2017). Forensic and Investigative Accounting (7th ed.). Wolters Kluwer / CCH Incorporated.
Dako, O. F., Onalaja, T. A., Nwachukwu, P. S., Bankole, F. A., & Lateefat, T. (2020). Forensic Accounting Frameworks Addressing Fraud Prevention in Emerging Markets through Advanced Investigative Auditing Techniques. Journal of Frontiers in Multidisciplinary Research, 1(2), 46–63. https://doi.org/10.54660/.JFMR.2020.1.2.46-63
Devi, P. N., Widanaputra, A. A. G. P., Budiasih, I. G. A. N., & Rasmini, N. K. (2021). The Effect of Fraud Pentagon Theory on Financial Statements: Empirical Evidence from Indonesia. Journal of Asian Finance, Economics and Business, 8, 1163–1169. https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:234190545
Donthu, N., Kumar, S., Mukherjee, D., Pandey, N., & Lim, W. M. (2021). How to conduct a bibliometric analysis: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 133, 285–296. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.04.070
Fathmaningrum, E. S., & Anggarani, G. (2021). Fraud Pentagon and Fraudulent Financial Reporting: Evidence from Manufacturing Companies in Indonesia and Malaysia. Journal of Accounting and Investment, 22(3), 625–646. https://doi.org/10.18196/jai.v22i3.12538
Haddad, H., Alharasis, E. E., Fraij, J., & Al-Ramahi, N. M. (2024). How Do Innovative Improvements in Forensic Accounting and Its Related Technologies Sweeten Fraud Investigation and Prevention? WSEAS TRANSACTIONS ON BUSINESS AND ECONOMICS, 21, 1115–1141. https://doi.org/10.37394/23207.2024.21.93
Muhammad, I., & Triansyah, F. A. (2023). Panduan Lengkap Analisis Bibliometrik dengan VOSViewer : Memahami Perkembangan dan Tren Penelitian di Era Digital (Kodri, Ed.; 1st ed.). CV Adanu Abimata.
Mustafa Airout, R., Abu Azam, S., & Airout, M. (2024). Bibliometric insights into the intellectual dynamics of forensic accounting research. Cogent Business & Management, 11(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2024.2344748
Nugroho, D., & Diyanty, V. (2022). HEXAGON FRAUD IN FRAUDULENT FINANCIAL STATEMENTS: THE MODERATING ROLE OF AUDIT COMMITTEE. Jurnal Akuntansi Dan Keuangan Indonesia, 19(1), 46–67. https://doi.org/10.21002/jaki.2022.03
Ozili, P. K. (2023). Forensic accounting research around the world. Journal of Financial Reporting and Accounting. https://doi.org/10.1108/JFRA-02-2023-0106
Prahani, B. K., Rizki, I. A., Suprapto, N., Irwanto, I., & Kurtuluş, M. A. (2024). Mapping research on scientific creativity: A bibliometric review of the literature in the last 20 years. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 52, 101495. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2024.101495
Sayidah, N., Assagaf Aminullah, Hartati, S. J., & Muhajir. (2019). Akuntansi Forensik dan Audit Investigatif (Vol. 1). Zifatama Jawara.
Schuchter, A., & Levi, M. (2016). The Fraud Triangle revisited. Security Journal, 29(2), 107–121. https://doi.org/10.1057/sj.2013.1
van Eck, Nees Jan, & Waltman, L. (2023). VOSviewer Manual: Manual for VOSviewer Version 1.6.20.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.32509/jakpi.v5i1.7698
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Indexed by:
Recommended Tools :
Redaksi Jurnal JAKPI
Fakultas Ekonomi dan Bisnis Universitas Prof. Dr. Moestopo (Beragama)
Jl. Hang Lekir I No. 8 Jakarta 10270
Email: jakpi@jrl.moestopo.ac.id







