REPRESENTASI BERITA POLITIK  DI TELEVISI DALAM TINJAUAN PERSPEKTIF  INDEPENDENSI BERITA

Hadiati Hadiati

doi:10.32509/pustakom.v1i1.545

REPRESENTASI BERITA POLITIK DI TELEVISI DALAM TINJAUAN PERSPEKTIF INDEPENDENSI BERITA

Hadiati Hadiati

Abstract

The main aim of this study is to investigate and critically examines the view of the political news representation on Jakarta gubernatorial election 2017. This study employed critical discourse analysis to investigate the power bias in news coverage of Jakarta election on TV One and Metro TV and seeks to examine the ideology behind the television media. A critical discourse analysis of the data revealed several findings. First, the television media coverage on the political news of Jakarta election in the form of text was ambiguous. While the political news has been positioned around the public sector that supposed to be politically neutral, nevertheless the media still produce subjective discourses. Second, the existence of certain interest groups has a significant effect on text production process in media. Third, the production of texts and the discourse practice in the media coverage of Jakarta's gubernatorial election are influenced by the particular regime interests, since the editorial room and the television studio are still considered as places of power. Fourth, the insensitivity of media objectivity is closely related to the sociocultural context that has developed in the society. The sociocultural profession of journalists in the Indonesian society still tends to be perceived as belonging to the power of incumbency. Thus, the political news representation remains heavily influenced by power.The power bias which is a problem in a democratic society, actually still growing and remaining in the television media, especially when representing the political news. The medias potential to construct reality cannot be ignored. In other words, the change of democratic political system and media liberalization is not directly proportional to the expected changing in the attitude of the media in representing unbiased political news.

Keywords

Media, Representation, Political News, Jakarta Gubernatorial Election, Bias Power

Full Text:

PDF

References

Abdulah, Irwan. 1997. Sangkan Paran Obyektifitas. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.

Alatas, Syed Hussein. 1986. Sosiologi, Sebuah Penjelajahan dengan Data Kontemporer. Jakarta: LP3ES.

Austin, J. L. 1962. How to Do Things With Words. Oxford: University Press.

Barker, Chris, 2000. Cultural Studies: Theory and Practice. London: Sage Publications.

Barker, Chris, 2004. Cultural Studies: Teori dan Praktik. Diterjemahkan Nurhadi. Yogyakarta: Kreasi Diskursus.

Berger Peter dan Luckman, Thomas. 1990 Tafsiran Sosial Atas Kenyataan Risalah Tentang Sosiologi Pengetahuan. LP3ES, Jakarta.

Budi, Setio, Industri Televisi Swasta Indonesia dalam Perspektif Ekonomi Politik. Jurnal Ilmu Komunikasi, Volume I Nomor 1. Tahun 2004. Yogyakarta: Universitas Atmajaya.

Butler, Judith. 1995. Contingent Foundations. Dalam Seyla Bendhabib dkk. (ed.), t Contention. New York: Routledge.

Creswell, J.W. 1998. Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five traditions. London: Sage.

Curran, James, Michael Gurevitch & Janet Woollacott (1982): 'The study of the media: theoretical approaches'. In Gurevitch et al. (Eds.), op. cit.

Eriyanto. 2008. Analisis Diskursus: Pengantar Analisis Teks Media. Yogyakarta: LKIS.

Fairclough, Norman, 1998. Critical Discourse Analysis and the Marketization of Public Discourse: The University, dalam Critical Discourse Analysis, London and New York, Longman.

Fakih, Mounsur. 1996. Menggeser Konsep Obyektifitasdan Transformasi Sosial. Jakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.

Fakih, Mansour. 2003. Analisis Obyektifitasdan Transformasi Sosial. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.

Fiske, J. 1987. Television Culture. London: Methuen.

Fiske, John (1992): 'British Cultural Studies and Television'. In Allen (Ed.), op. cit. [includes summary of Hall's account of 'preferred readings' and alternative reading strategies: pp 292-3]

Foucault, Michel. 1990. Power and Knowledge. New York: Phanteon.

Garnham, Nicholas. Political Economy and Cultural Studies: Reconciliation or Divorce? dalam Critical Studies in Mass Communication, (March/1995): 62-71.

Goodin, Robert. E, and Klingemann, Hans-Dieter. 1996 Political Methodology: New Handbook of Political Science. 76986. New York.

Goodin, Robert. E, and Klingemann, Hans-Dieter. Contribution to a Political Economy of Mass Communication dalam Media and Cultural Studies: Keyworks, eds. Meenakshi Gigi Durham and Douglas Kellner. Malden, Mass: Blackwell Publishers, 2001.

Goodin, Robert. E, and Klingemann, Hans-Dieter. The Political Economy of Communication Revisited dalam The Handbook of Political Economy of Communications, eds. Wasko, Janet, Graham Murdock, dan Helena Sousa. Chichester, West Sussex: Wiley-Blackwell, 2011.

Guba, Egon G dan Lincoln, Yvonne S, Competing Paradigms in Qualitative Research, dalam Denzin, Norman K, dan Yvonna 8 Lincoln, eds, Handbook of Qualitaritve Research (London : Sage Publication.

Gurevitch, Michael, Tony Bennett, James Curran & Janet Woollacott (Ed.) (1982): Culture, Society and the Media. London: Methuen (Part 1, 'Class, Ideology and the Media')

Guy Cook. 1994. The Discourse of Advertising, London and New York, Routledge.

Hall. S. 1997. The Spactacle of the Other dalam S. Hall (ed.) Representations. London and Thousand Oaks: Sage.

Hidayat, Dedy Nur. 1995. Indonesia : The Challenge of Change, bab IX : Media between the Palace and the Market, University of Hawai Press

Hidayat, Dedy N, EffendiGazali, Harsono Suwardi, Ishadi SK. (Ed). 2000. Pers dalam Revolusi Mei: Runtuhnya Sebuah Hegemony.Jakarta: Gramedia Pustaka Utama

Ibrahim, Idi Subandy & Sunarto, Hanif (Eds.). 1998. Berita politik dan Media : Konstruksi ideologi obyektifitasdalam Ruang Publik Orde Baru. Bandung: PT. Remaja Rosdakarya

Ismail, Yusca. 1997. Kepentingan Komersiil vs Kepentingan Idiil:Sebuah Kenyataan, makalah seminarHarmonisasi Ruang Publik dan Komersialisme Dalam Pertelevisian Kita, Asosiasi Pascasarjana Komunikasi Universitas Indonesia

Krishnan, P. dan Dighe, A. 1990. Affirmation and Denial: The Construction of Femininity on India Televition. London and Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

Liliweri, Alo. 1994. Dasar-dasar Komunikasi Antarbudaya. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.

McQuail, Dennis. 1987. Teori Komunikasi Massa, terj Agus Dharma dan Aminuddin Ram. Jakarta: Erlangga.

McQuail, Denis. 2005. Mass Communication Theory. London: Sage Publication: 2002; Noam Chomsky. Kuasa Media, Terj. Nurhady Sirimorok. Yogyakarta: Pinus.

Mishra. V. 1985. Toward a Theoretical Critique of Bombay Cinema, Screen. 26.

Piliang, Amir Yasraf (1998), Masih Adakah AuraBerita politik di Balik Euphoria Media dalam Idi Subandi Ibrahim dan Hanif Suranto (Ed), Berita politik dan Media, Konstruksi Ideologi obyektifitasdalam Ruang Publik Orde Baru, Remaja Rosdakarya, Bandung.

Piliang, Amir Yasraf. 1994. Estetika dan Abnormalitas: Seni dan Komponen Komoditi, Majalah Kajian Ekonomi dan Sosial Prisma, LP3ES, No. 11, 1994.

Moleong, Lexy. 2007. Metode Penelitian Kualitatif. Bandung: PT Rosdakarya

Mulyana, Dedy, Idi Subandy Ibrahim. 1997. Bercinta Dengan Televis.Bandung: Remaja Rosda Karya

Nugroho, Garin. 1995. Kekuasaan dan Hiburan. Yogyakarta: Yayasan Bentang Budaya

Ritzer, George dan Douglas J. Goodman. 2008. Teori Sosiologi. Diterjemahkan oleh Nurhadi. Yogyakarta: Kreasi Diskursus.

Samovar, Larry A. 1985. Communication Between Culture. (4th edition) Wadsworth Pub. Co.

Sardar, Ziauddin dan Borin Van Loon. 2008. Membongkar Kuasa Media. Diterjemahkan Dina Septi Utama. Yogyakarta: Resist Book.

Shoemaker, J. Pamela, Stephen D. Reese, 2001, Mediating The Messages, Theories of Influences on Media Content, USA : Longman Publishers.

Siregar, Ashadi (1998), Media Berita politik, Apakah Produk Dikotomi Pria-Berita politik?, dalam Idi Subandi Ibrahim dan Hanif Suranto (Ed), Berita politik dan Media, Konstruksi Ideologi obyektifitasKonstruksi Ideologi obyektifitasdalam Ruang Publik Orde Baru, Bandung :Remaja Rosdakarya.

Siregar, Ashadi. 1998. Bagaimana Meliput dan Menulis Untuk Media Massa. Yogyakarta: LP3Y

Siregar, Ashadi., Rondang Pasaribu..........& Imay Prihastuti. 2002. Eksplorasi Obyektifitasdi Ranah Jurnalisme. Yogyakarta: LP3Y

Severin, Werner dan Tankard, Jr. W, 2001. Communication Theories: Origins, Methode, and Use in the Mass Media. Chicago: Addison Wesley Longman, Inc.

Straus A. dan J. Corbin. 1990. Basic of Qualitative Research: Grounded Theories, Prosedure, and Tecnique. California: Sage Publications. Inc.

Storey, John. 1996. Culuture Studies and The Study of Popular Culture: Theories and Methods. Athens: The University of Georgia Press.

Storey, John. 2007. Cultural Studies dan Kajian Budaya Pop. Yogyakarta: Jalasutra.

Subono, Nur Iman. 2003. Menuju Jurnalisme Yang Berspektif Obyektifitas. Jurnal Berita politik. Vol. 28 No.2.

Tajfel, H. & Forgas, J. P. 1981. Social categorization: Cognitions, Values and Groups. dalam J. P.Forgas (ed.),Social Cognition: Perspectives on Everyday Understanding. London: Academic Press.

Thawaites, Tony. Lloyd Davis, Warwick Mules. 2002. Introducing Cultural and Media Studies: Sebuah Pengantar Semiotik. Yogyakarta: Jalasutra.

Williams. R. 1965. The Long Revolution. London: Penguin.

Wilska, Terhi-Anna. 2003. Mobile Phone Use as Part of Young Peoples Consumption Styles dalam Journal of Consumer Policy 26: 441-463, 2003. Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers

DOI: https://doi.org/10.32509/pustakom.v1i1.545