THE ROLE OF 3D MODEL AS SURGICAL GUIDANCE IN MANDIBULAR RECONSTRUCTION SURGERY

Mohammad Adhitya Latief, Benny S Latief, Lilies D S

Abstract


reconstruction surgery is a challenging surgery that require well prepared presurgical plan to minimize the risk of failure, to accommodate the need for precision preoperative planning, surgeons frequently need guidance such as a

3-dimensional (3D) model to display complex cranial structures. Evaluation of the 3D model as surgical guidance require a review measurement regarding its efficiency and pitfalls. Purpose: the purpose of this research is to understand the importants key points that will resulted succesfull reconstructive surgery using 3D model as surgical guidance. Method:   the evaluation of surgical result in mandibular reconstruction surgery from our Department Oral and Maxillofacial surgery, Universitas Indonesia from 2012 to 2017 reveal the differences. We analyze several keypoints that may affect to the succesfull of reconstruction surgery result. Result: we compared the result between years before and after 2015, this is where we start obligate all reconstruction surgery need to have preoperative planning using

3D Model. Several keypoints in using 3D model is acknowledgeable. Conclusion: the use of 3D models as surgical guidance has important role to minimize post reconstructive surgery result, surgeon need to understand the principal and keypoints in preoperative planning and regarding the use of 3D model.

 


Keywords


3D model, reconstruction plate, plate exposure, broken plate

Full Text:

Adhitya 79-85

References


Coppen C, Weijs W, Bergé SJ, Maal TJJ. Oromandibular reconstruction using 3D planned triple template method. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2013;71(8):243-247. doi:10.1016/j.joms.2013.03.004

van Gemert JTM, van Es RJJ, Van Cann EM, Koole R. Nonvascularized Bone Grafts for Segmental Reconstruction of the Mandible-A Reappraisal. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2009;67(7):1446-1452. doi:10.1016/j. joms.2008.12.052

Broer PN, Tanna N, Franco PB, et al. Ten-year evolution utilizing computer-assisted reconstruction for giant ameloblastoma. J Reconstr Microsurg.

;29(212):173-180. doi:10.1055/s-0032-1331144

Zheng G Sen, Su YX, Liao GQ, et al. Mandible reconstruction assisted by preoperative virtual surgical simulation. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol.

;113(5):604-611. doi:10.1016/j.tripleo.2011.05.016

Kermer C, Lindner a., Friede I, Wagner a., Millesi W.

Preoperative stereolithographic model planning for primary reconstruction in craniomaxillofacial trauma surgery. J Cranio-Maxillo-Facial Surg. 1998;26:136-

doi:10.1016/S1010-5182(98)80002-4

Reinbacher KE, Wallner J, Kärcher H, Pau M, Quehenberger F, Feichtinger M. Three dimensional comparative measurement of polyurethane milled skull models based on CT and MRI data sets. J Cranio-Maxillofacial Surg. 2012;40(8):e419-e425. doi:10.1016/j.jcms.2012.02.019

Huotilainen E, Jaanimets R, Valášek J, et al. Inaccuracies in additive manufactured medical skull models caused by the DICOM to STL conversion process. J Cranio- Maxillofacial Surg. 2014;42:259-265. doi:10.1016/j. jcms.2013.10.001

Wang CS, Wang WH a, Lin MC. STL rapid prototyping bio-CAD model for CT medical image segmentation. Comput Ind. 2010;61(3):187-197. doi:10.1016/j. compind.2009.09.005

Essig H, Rana M, Kokemueller H, et al. Pre-operative planning for mandibular reconstruction - A full digital

planning workflow resulting in a patient specific

reconstruction. Head Neck Oncol. 2011;3(1):45.

doi:10.1186/1758-3284-3-45

Apajalahti S, Kelppe J, Kontio R, Hagström J. Imaging characteristics of ameloblastomas and diagnostic value of computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging in a series of 26 patients. Oral Surgery, Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol. 2015;120(2):e118-e130. doi:10.1016/j.oooo.2015.05.002

Sa A, Kauke M, Timmer M, et al. Does volumetric measurement serve as an imaging biomarker for tumor aggressiveness of ameloblastomas ? 2018;78(November

:16-24. doi:10.1016/j.oraloncology.2018.01.002

Katsumura S, Sato K, Ikawa T, Yamamura K, Ando E, Shigeta Y. ‘‘ High-precision , reconstructed 3D model

” of skull scanned by conebeam CT : Reproducibility

verified using CAD / CAM data. 2016;18:37-43.

doi:10.1016/j.legalmed.2015.11.007

Varga E, Hammer B, Hardy BM, Kamer L. The accuracy of three-dimensional model generation. What makes it accurate to be used for surgical planning? Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2013;42(9):1159-1166. doi:10.1016/j. ijom.2013.02.006

Güngör E, Doğan MS. Reliability and accuracy of cone-

beam computed tomography voxel density and linear

distance measurement at different voxel sizes: A study

on sheep head cadaver. J Dent Sci. 2017;12(2):145-150.

doi:10.1016/j.jds.2016.11.004

Giannopoulos AA, Cai T, George E, et al. Medical

D Printing for the Radiologist. RadioGraphics.

;35(7):1965-1988.

Jacobs PF. Stereolithography and Other RP&M Technologies: From Rapid Prototyping to Rapid Tooling. Society of Manufacturing Engineers; 1996. https:// books.google.co.id/books?id=3YI0gvTyGtEC.

Farias TP, Dias FL, Sousa BA, Galvão MS, Bispo D, Pastl AC. Prototyping : Major Advance in Surgical Planning and Customizing Prostheses in Patients with Bone Tumors of the Head and Neck. 2013;2013(July):1-

Rijt EEM Van Der, Noorlag R, Koole R, Abbink JH, Rosenberg AJWP. Predictive factors for premature loss of Martin 2 . 7 mandibular reconstruction plates. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2015;53(2):121-125. doi:10.1016/j. bjoms.2014.10.010

Sandini SU, Vitria EE, Santoso TI. Profile of

Ameloblastoma from a Retrospective Study in Jakarta ,

Indonesia. 2011;18(2):27-32.

Azuma M, Yanagawa T, Kanno NI, et al. Mandibular

reconstruction using plates prebent to fit rapid

prototyping 3-dimensional printing models ameliorates

contour deformity. 2014:1-8.

Cohen A, Laviv A, Berman P, Nashef R, Abu-Tair J.

Mandibular reconstruction using stereolithographic

-dimensional printing modeling technology. Oral Surgery, Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endodontology. 2009;108(5):661-666. doi:10.1016/j. tripleo.2009.05.023

Rohner D, Guijarro-Martínez R, Bucher P, Hammer

B. Importance of patient-specific intraoperative guides

in complex maxillofacial reconstruction. J Cranio-

Maxillofacial Surg. 2013;41(5):382-390. doi:10.1016/j. jcms.2012.10.021




DOI: https://doi.org/10.32509/jitekgi.v16i2.1079

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2021 Jurnal Ilmiah dan Teknologi Kedokteran Gigi

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.