BIOLOGIC WIDTH CONCEPT IN GINGIVECTOMY

Desy Fidyawati

Abstract


Background: Relationship between periodontal tissue and aesthetic considerations is an important thing to determine the form, function and aesthetics of periodontal tissue itself. For orthodontic cases with gingival enlargement, using the biological width concept in gingivectomy to facilitate an optimal oral hygiene maintenance, function and aesthetic. Bone sounding before gingival recontouring is dictated by the distance from the gingiva crest to alveolar crest. Recommended distance between margins restoration and alveolar bone crest is 3 mm to avoid breaching the biologic width.

Case and Case Management: Case 1: A 21 years old female patient whom referred from orthodontist with gingival enlargement in upper front teeth after treated with fixed orthodontic for 1.5 years. PBI: 1,6. After clinical examination, bone sounding was performed = 7mm and gingivectomy without ostectomy was determined. Case 2: A male patient, 24 years old, with gingival enlargement in upper front teeth while treated with fixed orthodontic. After determined the problem, bone sounding (6 mm) was performed along with gingivectomy without ostectomy also for anterior upper right site.

Conclusion: The purpose of this report is to provide a diagnostic rationale for gingival recontouring. When gingivectomy is determined, the concept of biological width must be applied achieve a harmonious gingival contour with an optimal oral hygiene maintenance.


Keywords


Biologic width, gingival recontouring, orthodontic treatment

Full Text:

PDF Desy

References


Verma SC, Govila V, Govila S, Mohan S. Determination of Biologic Width and Its Relevence in Periodontics And Restorative Dentistry. Indian Journal of Dental Sciences. 2015;7(2):106-109.

Khuller N, Sarma N. Biologic Width : Evaluation and Correction of its Violation. J. Oral Health Comm Dent. 2009;3(1):20-25.

Jorgic-Srdjak K, Plancak D, Maricevic T, Dragon M, Bonsjak A. Periodontal and prosthetic aspect of biological width part I : Violation of biologic width. Acta Stomatol Croat. 2000;34:197-197.

Jorgic-Srdjak K, Dragon M, Bonsjak A, Plancak D, Filipovic I, Lazic D. Periodontal and prosthetic aspect of biologic width part II : Reconstruction of anatomy and function. Acta Stomatol Croat. 2000;34:441-444.

Smukler H, Chaibi M. Periodontal and Dental Consideration in Clinical Crown Extension: A Rationale basis for treatment. Int J Periodont Restor Dent. 1997;17:464-477.

Eid HA, Assiri HAM, Kandyala R, Togo RA, Turakhia VS. Gingival Enlargement in Different Age Groups during Fixed Orthodontics Treatment. Journal of International Oral Health. 2014;6(1):1-4.

Surlin P, Rauten AM, Mogoanta L, Silosi I, Opera B, Pirici D. Correlation between the gingival crevicular fluid MMP8 levels and gingival overgrowth in patiens with fixed orthodontic devices. Romanian Journal of Morpholog. 2010;51(3):515-519.

Kokich VG. The Role of Orthodontic as an adjunct to periodontal therapy. In: Newman MG, Takei HH, Carranza FA, eds. Clinical Periodontology 9ed. Philadelphia: Saunders; 2003:704-705.

Ganji KK, Patil VA. A Comparative Evaluation for Biologic Width following Surgical Crown Lengthening using Gingivectomy and Ostectomy Procedure. International Journal of Dentistry. 2012:1-9.

Shoba KS, Mahantesha, Sesha H, Mani R, Kranti K. Clinical evaluation of the biologic width following surgical crown lengthening procedure. A prospective study. J Indian Soc. Periodontol. 2010;14:160-167.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.32509/jitekgi.v16i2.1086

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2021 Jurnal Ilmiah dan Teknologi Kedokteran Gigi

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.