PENYESUAIAN ROLE IDENTITY DALAM PERSPEKTIF IMAGINED INTERACTION (Studi Tentang Wanita Yang Ditinggal Mati Suami)
Abstract
The objective of this study is to understand the use of Imagined Interaction as coping to women who lost her
husband. Moreover, this study try to understand the self efficacy after the lost of husband and comprehend the psy-chosocial aspects in order to adjust one womens role identity who left by her husband. This study used Honeycutt
framework about imagined interaction, and as a supporting study, the author use symbolic interaction concepts.
This is a qualitative research that uses post-positivist paradigm method. The data collection method used is in
depth interview to 5 women who already lost her husband. Based on this study, identified imagined interaction
activities in women who lost husband performed with significant other and devine other. While a role identity
adjustment process was found 3 (three) categories are Realistic Adjustment, Moderate Adjustment, and Imagined
Adjustment. In the adjustment process there are 3 (three) types of self-efficacy, namely :Acceptance Self-Efficacy:
Sincere acceptance towards the lost of husband and optimist about the future; Negotiated Self-Efficacy: Sincere
acceptance, however stay pessimist about the future; Imagined Self-Efficacy: Insincere acceptance, lack of confi-dence and very pessimist towards the future.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Allen, T.H. (1994). Absence makes the mind workharder : Imagine interactions and coping with
geographical separations. New Orleans , LA.
Atkinson, R. L., Atkinson, A. C., dan Hilgard, E. R.
(1983).Introduction to psychology. Eight Edi-tion. California : Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
Apple, C.G. (1989). Freedom of choice: Intrapersonal
communication and emotion. New orlean. L.A.
Spectra.
Bandura, A. (1997). Self efficacy: The exercise of con-trol. New york: W.H. Freeman.
Blumer, H. (1969). Symbolic interactionism. Engle-wood cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Boerner, K. & Slverman, P.R. (2001). Gender specific
coping patterns in widowed parents with depen-dent children. Omega : Journal of death and dy-ing, 43 (2).
Bremen, Jan & Van Der Bosch, Laurens. (1995). Be-tween Poverty And The Pyre : Moments In The
History Of widowhood. Routledge. London-Newyork.
Brooks, J.B. (1987). The process of parenting. Sec-ond edition. California : Mayfield Publishing
Company.
Bungin, Burhan. (2006). Sosiologi Komunikasi : Teori
Paradigma Dan Diskursus Teknologi Komuni-kasi Di Masyarakat. Kencana. Jakarta.
Creswell, W. John. (2007. Qualitative Inquiry And Re-search Design: Choosing Among five Approach-es. Sage Publications. USA
Denzin, Norman, K. & Lincoln, Ivonna,S. (2009) .
Handbook of qualitative research. Sage Publica-tion, Pvt. Ltd.
Goldsmith, Daena J. (2004). Communicating Social
Support. Cambridge University Press. UK.
Gotcher, J.M. & Edwards, R. (1990). Coping strategies
of cancer patient: Actual communication and
imagined interaction. Health communication,
(4).
Hagood Lee, Susan (2006). Rice Plus: Widows And
Economic Survival In Rural Cambodia. Rout-ledge. Newyork &London.
Hennink, Monique; Hutter, Inge; Bailey, Ajay ( 2011).
Qualitative Research Methods.Sage publications
Inc.
Hidayat, Komaruddin. (2012) .Psikologi Kematian:
Mengubah ketakutan menjadi optimisme. Pener-bit Noura Books. Jakarta.
Hier, P. Sean. (2005). Contemporary Sociological
Thought: Themes And Theories. Canadian
Scholars Pers inc. Toronto.
Honeycutt, J.M. (2010). Imagine Interaction. Ameri-can Psychological Association.
Honeycutt, J. M. (2003). Imagined interactions: Day-dreaming about communication. Cresskill, NJ:
Hampton Press.
Honeycutt, J.M. & Edwards, R., & Zagacki, K.S.
(1989-1990). Using imagine interaction featrues
to predict measures of self awareness : Loneli-ness, locus of control, self dominance and emo-tional intensity. Imagination, Cogniton, and Per-sonality.
Honeycutt, J.M. Zagacki, K.S. & Edwards, R. (1988).
Intrapersonal commnuciation, social cognition
and imagine interaction. In C.Roberts & K. Wat-son (Eds), Readings in Intrapersonal Communi-cationm Spectra Incorporated Publisher.
Honeycutt, J.M. (2003-2004). Imagine Interaction
Conflict Linkage Theory: Explaining the presis-tence and resolution of interpersonal conflict in
everyday life. Imagination, Cognition and Per-sonality. Vol.23.
Iversen, Annette, E. (2000). Mode of death, grief and
reaction.Bell & Howel Information and learning
Company.
Kephart, William, M. & Jedlica, Davor. (1991). The
family, society and the individual. Harper Col-lins. New york
Lazarus, R. S. dan Folkman, S. (1984). Stress, apprais-al, and coping. New York: Springer Publishing
Company.
Little John, Stephen,W. (2001). Theories of human
communication.Wadsworth publishing compa-ny.
McCall, G.J, & Simmons, J.L. (1978). Identities and
interactions. New york : Free Press.
Mead, G,H. (1934). Mind, self and society from stand-point of a social behaviourist. Chicago: Univer-sity of Chicago Press.
Mulyana, Deddy.( 2001). Ilmu Komunikasi Suatu Pen-gantar. Penerbit Pt Remadja Rosdakarya. Band-ung.
Muslimah, Hanifah Latief. (2012). Konsep diri pada
janda cerai(Studi kasus pada wanita yang men-jadi orang tua tunggal). UIN Jogjakarta.
Neuman, W. Lawrence. (2011). 7th
ed. Social research
methods: Qualitative and Quantitative Ap-proaches. Pearson education, Inc.
Owen, Margaret. (1996). A World Of Widows.Zed
Books Ltd. London-UK.
Parkes, C.M. (1985). Bereavement. The British journal
of psychiatry. 146.
Patton, Michael Quinn. 2002. Qualitative Research and
Evaluation Methods, 3rdEdition. California: Sage Publication
Papalia, D.E., Olds, Olds. S.W, Feldmen, R.D. (2008).
Human Development. Edisi 9. Jakarta : Prenada
media group
Rahmat, Jalaludin. (2003). Psikologi Komunikasi.
Bandung: PT. Remaja Rosdakarya.
Rosenblatt, P.C., & Meyer, C. (1986). Imagine interac-tion in the family. Family relations, 35.
Samovar. A. Larry, et al (2010). Communication Be-tween Cultures.7
th
.cengage learning asia, PTA,
Singapore
Stryker. (1980). Symbolic interactionism: A structural
version. Palo Alto, CA: Benjamin Cummings.
Schuter, S.R. & Zisook, S. (1986). Treatment of spousal
bereavement. : A multidimensional; approach.
Psychiatric Annals, 16(5).
Sitorus, Magda (2012). Semua Ada Waktunya. Jalan
sutra. Jogjakarta.
Syahrir, Kartini (2014). Rumah Janda. Penerbit: Yayas-an Pustaka Obor Indonesia
Taylor & Sears, D.O. (2006). Social Psychology. 12
th
ed.
New Jersey. Prentice-hall.
Thompson, T.L. & Nussbaumm J.F. (1988). Interper-sonal communication : Intimate relationships
and aging. In C.W. Carmichael, C.H. Botan & R.
Hawkins (eds), Human communication and the
aging process. Prospect heights, IL: Waveland.
Vocate, Donna, R. (1994). Intrapersonal Communica-tion: Different Voices, Different Minds. Law-rence Erlbaum Associate, Inc, Publisher 365 ,
New Jersey.
West, R, & L.H. Turner. (2007). Introducing commu-nication theory: Analysis and Application. New
york. McGraw-Hill.
Wiryasaputra, Totok S. (2003). Mengapa Berduka:
Kreatif Mengelola Perasaan Duka. Penerbit
Kanisius. Yogyakarta.
Jurnal/ Paper/Disertasi
Abbot, James. (2007). Intrapersonal communication
and well being. University of Grand forks, North
Dakota.
Boerner, K. & Slverman, P.R. (2001). Gender specific
coping patterns in widowed parents with depen-dent children. Omega : Journal of death and dy-ing, 43 (2).
Burke , P.J. & Tully, J.C. (1977). The measurement of
role identity.Social forces, 55 (4).
Cohen, Jessey. (2011). Social Support Received Online
And Offline By Individuals Diagnoses Cancer.
A dissertation. Virginia Commonwealth Univer-sity.
Demi, A.S.. (1984). Social adjustment of widows after
sudden death: suicide and non suicide survivors
compared. Death education, 8.
DeVito, Joseph A. 2000. Human Communication: the
Basic Course. 8th ed. USA:
Addison-Wesl.
Ford, Sheery Green wood. (2003). The role of imagined
interaction and self efficacy psychosocial adjust-ment to spousal bereavement: A commnication
perspective. Lousiana State University
Eidenmuller & Honeycutt JM. (2010). Charakteristic
And Functions Of Imagined Interactions Com-pared With Interpersonal Prayer. Lousiana State
University. Utyler.Edu.
Hidayat, Dedy N. 2008. Dikotomi Kualitatif Kuan-titatif dan Varian Paradigmatik dalam Penelitian
Kualitatif. Jurnal Ilmiah SCRIPTURA Vol2, No
Juli 2008.
Honeycutt, James & Ford, G.Sherry. (2009). Mental
Imagery And Intrapersonal Communication: A
Review Of Research on Imagined Interaction
Communication Research and Current Develop-ment. Communication Year Book 25
Michael, Scott T & Crowther, Martha, R & Schmid,
Betina.(2003) Coping Responses To Bereave-ment.
Nock, Sl. (1987).Time together among dual earner cou-ples.American Sociological review.
Perrig, Chiello.Paquilino. (2015) Cohort And Gender
Differences In Psychosocial Adjustment To Lat-er Live Widowhood. Journals Of Gerontology
Series B : Psychological Sciences And Social
Science.
Petress, K.C. (1990).The role imagine interactions
played in the Tian-an-men Square student dem-onstration: An analysis of participants self re-porting. American Asociation for the study of
mental imagery. Lowell, MA.Ramaraju, S. (2012).Psychological Perspectives On In-terpersonal Communication.Journal of Arts, Sci-ence & Commerce.4(2).
Sanders, C.M. (1981).Comparison of younger and
older spouses in bereavement outcome. Omega:
Journal of Death and Dying, 11
Tong, Yan. (2006). Transition To Widowhood , Men-tal And Health :Moderating Effects Of Gender,
Age, Duration of Widowhood, Preloss Marital
Quality, Preloss Spusal Caregiving And Tradi-tional Family Attitudes. University Of Wiscon-sin Madison.
Van Baarsen, B. & Van Groenaou, M. (2001Partn Loss
in later life: Gender differences in coping short-ly after bereavement. Journal of loss and trau-ma,6(3)
Watkins Myria. Et.al. (2006). Imagine Interaction, fam-ily money management patterns and coalitions,
and attituddes toward money and credit. Pub-lished online: Springer Science+Business Me-dia, LL
Zagacki, K.S., Edwards, R. Honeycutt, J.M. (1992).
The role of mental imagery and emotion in imag-ined interation. Communication quarterly, 40.
Zisook, S & Schuter, S.R. (1985). Time course of spou-sal bereavement.General hospital psychiatry,
(2).
DOI: https://doi.org/10.32509/wacana.v14i4.133
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Indexed by:
Recommended Tools :
WACANA: Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Komunikasi
Fakultas Ilmu Komunikasi, Universitas Prof. Dr. Moestopo (Beragama)
Kampus I, Jl. Hang Lekir I/8 Jakarta Pusat, Indonesia 10270
WA: 085714422271 (Chat Only)
email: wacana@dsn.moestopo.ac.id
WACANA: Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Komunikasi Licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.