Probability And Bayesian Inference In Human Communication
Abstract
This paper challenges the applicability of traditional information theory's frequentist approach to human communication, arguing that it fails to capture the unique, singular nature of communicative acts. Traditional theory, based on long-term observation and relative frequencies, overlooks the complexity and context-dependency inherent in human interactions. The objective is to redefine communication understanding through a Bayesian model that emphasises subjective probability and the critical role of beliefs and intentions. Utilising a rationalist methodology, the research conducts a qualitative analysis of theoretical concepts and prior research, proposing a new model that situates probability within the philosophy of communication. This model highlights the subjective beliefs and intentions that govern communication, challenging existing paradigms and contributing to a deeper understanding of communicative dynamics. The results reveal the limitations of the frequentist approach and demonstrate the applicability of a Bayesian perspective, advocating for a paradigm shift in communication theory towards a sender-oriented model. This shift not only challenges existing paradigms but also offers a more nuanced understanding of communication as a fundamentally human endeavour.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDF (ENGLISH)References
Adriaans, P. (2020). A computational theory of meaning. In Advances in Info-Metrics: Information and Information Processing across Disciplines. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190636685.003.0002
Ahmed, Y. (2023). Shannon Capacity. In Signals and Communication Technology: Vol. Part F1285. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-2917-7_5
Amiri, M. (2023). A Physical Theory of Information Vs. A Mathematical Theory of Communication. International Journal of Information Sciences and Techniques, 13(3). https://doi.org/10.5121/ijist.2023.13301
Arumugam, S., Damotharan, A., & Marudhachalam, S. (2023). Class Probability Distribution Based Maximum Entropy Model for Classification of Datasets with Sparse Instances. Computer Science and Information Systems, 20(3). https://doi.org/10.2298/CSIS211030001S
Barwise, J. (2016). Three Views of Common Knowledge. In Readings in Formal Epistemology. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-20451-2_37
Culbertson, J., & Sturtz, K. (2014). A categorical foundation for bayesian probability. Applied Categorical Structures, 22(4). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10485-013-9324-9
Davis, M. H., & Sohoglu, E. (2022). Three Functions of Prediction Error for Bayesian Inference in Speech Perception. In The Cognitive Neurosciences. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/11442.003.0022
Devanesan, A. (2023). The Reference Class Problem and Probabilities in the Individual Case: A Response to Fuller. Philosophy of Science, 90(4). https://doi.org/10.1017/psa.2023.74
Futerman, A. G., & Block, W. E. (2017). A Praxeological Approach to Intentional Action. Studia Humana, 6(4). https://doi.org/10.1515/sh-2017-0024
Gilboa, I., & Marinacci, M. (2016). Ambiguity and the Bayesian Paradigm. In Readings in Formal Epistemology. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-20451-2_21
Hoppe, H.-H. (2021). The Limits of Numerical Probability: Frank H. Knight and Ludwig von Mises and the Frequency Interpretation. REVISTA PROCESOS DE MERCADO. https://doi.org/10.52195/pm.v3i2.337
Lista, L. (2023). Frequentist Probability and Inference. In Lecture Notes in Physics (Vol. 1010). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-19934-9_6
Megger, D. (2021). Determinism, free will, and the Austrian School of Economics. Journal of Economic Methodology, 28(3). https://doi.org/10.1080/1350178X.2021.1926528
Meyniel, F., Sigman, M., & Mainen, Z. F. (2015). Confidence as Bayesian Probability: From Neural Origins to Behavior. In Neuron (Vol. 88, Issue 1). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2015.09.039
Mises, L. Von. (1998). Human Action: a Treatise on Economics, the scholar’s edition. In International Affairs (Vol. 26, Issue 2).
Pagès, G. (2018). Numerical probability. Universitext.
Shannon, C. E., & Weaver, W. (1949). The Mathematical Theory of Communication, by CE Shannon (and Recent Contributions to the Mathematical Theory of Communication). In University of iIlinois Press.
Shen, N., González-Arévalo, B., & Pericchi, L. R. (2023). Comparison Between Bayesian and Frequentist Tail Probability Estimates. The New England Journal of Statistics in Data Science. https://doi.org/10.51387/23-nejsds39
STEINBRUNER, J. D. (2021). The Cybernetic Paradigm. In The Cybernetic Theory of Decision. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv1nxctxf.8
Titelbaum, M. G. (2022). Fundamentals of Bayesian Epistemology 1: Introducing Credences. Fundamentals of Bayesian Epistemology 1.
Verburgt, L. M. (2021). Khinchin’s 1929 Paper on Von Mises’ Frequency Theory of Probability. Statistical Science, 36(3). https://doi.org/10.1214/20-STS798
Williamson, J. (2013). From Bayesian epistemology to inductive logic. Journal of Applied Logic, 11(4). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jal.2013.03.006
DOI: https://doi.org/10.32509/wacana.v23i1.3388
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Indexed by:
Recommended Tools :
WACANA: Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Komunikasi
Fakultas Ilmu Komunikasi, Universitas Prof. Dr. Moestopo (Beragama)
Kampus I, Jl. Hang Lekir I/8 Jakarta Pusat, Indonesia 10270
WA: 085714422271 (Chat Only)
email: wacana@dsn.moestopo.ac.id
WACANA: Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Komunikasi Licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.